🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". A law may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to enact a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.