🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.